DIRTy Work

In Uncategorized by Alex Quigley47 Comments

Excuse the cheap pun of a title. With all the public furore about the Daily Mail I couldn’t help but be mindful of a tabloid headline! DIRT, if you didn’t know, is an acronym. Apologies if you are tired of acronyms, but admit it, sometimes they are just plain useful. DIRT stands for ‘Dedicated Improvement and Reflection Time‘. It has become a useful short-hand for checking, drafting, proof reading and for labelling the age-old process of students spending crucial time on improving their work.

I originally came across its use in Jackie Beere’s book, ‘The Perfect OFSTED Lesson‘. In the two years hence it has gradually become a staple feature in our English department. After a short presentation to the whole staff last year, it has begun to slowly spread as a language to harness time to enhance the standard of students’ work as well as using it to give quality feedback. DIRTy work then is that old fashioned stuff – getting students working really hard to ensure that the standard of their work is the best it can be.

Time is the thing. Too often we spend a great deal of time marking student work and giving them excellent feedback to improve. Crucially, however, students often spend a relatively short amount of time scanning the feedback for a grade or a level and then move on. Similarly, with a draft of their work they give the feedback a cursory glance, but they hurry on with supposed improvements and make the same mistakes once more. DIRT is about redressing that issue.

When I came across the acronym is was at a similar time to reading Ron Berger’s excellent book, ‘An Ethic of Excellence‘. Ron used the following to describe the essence of DIRTy work and its value:

“Most discussions of assessment start in the wrong place. The most important assessment that goes on in a school isn’t done to students but goes on inside students. Every student walks around with a picture of what is acceptable, what is good enough. Each time he works on something he looks at it and assesses it. Is this good enough? Do I feel comfortable handing this in? Does it meet my standards? Changing assessment at this level should be the most important assessment goal of every school. How do we get inside students’ heads and turn up the knob that regulates quality and effort” (P103, ‘An Ethic of Excellence’)

Essentially, DIRT is about having the highest expectations of students and them having the highest expectations of themselves.

This week, in our whole staff training on DIRT, we shined a light on the excellent practice already existing in different subject areas. In Food Technology they used booklets which scaffold student understanding helpfully, step by step, with the expectation that students act upon their feedback using DIRT – writing appropriate comments in response to teacher feedback. In History they have invested in a bulk purchase of green pens which signal a drafting and proof reading focus in their exercise books. Their books are regularly daubed in green and a clear signal is sent that improving their writing is a basic, but crucial expectation of their learning. For the History department, DIRTy time is about improving extended writing and ensuring students proof read their work automatically. In Maths there is a real focus upon reflection and responding to precision feedback. There is a forensic analysis of their own work, question by question, with DIRT providing the impetus for such reflection in real terms.

Through our experiences and the shared expertise across departments, I was able to define a top five tips list for DIRT.

1. Keep it focused.

If you simply hand back work to students and tell them to improve it all then the response will invariably less than successful! Other than the few students whose work was lazily hashed together at the last minute, most students’ work is faulty because they don’t know how to make it better. They need specific support and to avoid overloading students we need to focus in upon specific improvements to sir work.

In English, this often includes drafting and proof reading their extended writing. To ensure students can best manage their improvements, we would often narrow down the focus, such as reflecting upon spelling strategies and/or punctuation usage, then ask students to make improvements in these specific areas. Given this learning focus, students then need a really clear focus in terms of time. With clear task instructions, including timing and outlining exact expectations, students can be more focused in their DIRT time and considerably more effective.

2. Model and scaffold.

Once more, letting students loose for twenty minutes to overhaul their work to reach new heights doesn’t simply happen. Chatter and disruption is more likely! A range of models and resources to scaffold their understanding are required. In English, our focus is mostly concentrated upon literacy standards. That requires the obvious scaffolded support of the teacher, but it can be supplemented by tools, such as a dictionary and thesaurus, literacy mats, their school planner etc.

Models of work, with specific strengths or weaknesses, are crucially effective in determining what Berger describes as the assessment going on inside the head of students. Seeing an outstanding exemplar of a particular genre of writing, for example, helps lessen the load and gives students a high standard to reach for with their work. Reviewing a faulty example, picking apart its flaws with the teacher, or improving upon a weak example of work also helps scaffold their understanding about what is required to improve their own work. DIRT time may seemly be about independent work, but in actuality there is a great of reliance upon scaffolded teacher expertise.

3. Targeted feedback.

If students are receiving regular quality feedback that is targeted and precise in each of their subject areas then cumulatively they should learn clear patterns regarding how they need to improve in specific subject areas as well as recognising common patterns. Marking is therefore crucial – it determines teacher planning and it can be a defining factor for successful DIRT.

The evidence about the importance of quality feedback is well founded. Put simply, feedback and DIRT are essential bedfellows. If we give great feedback, with specific targets to improve, then DIRT is the crucial next step to deal with that feedback. As a rule of thumb, we can expect students to spend twice their time reflecting on their feedback as we devoted to giving feedback. Otherwise, really, what is the point of marking work and giving oral feedback?

4. Make oral feedback matter.

Oral feedback is too often relegated as the ugly step-sister to written feedback; however, we shouldn’t neglect using it. As proven for us in our ‘one to one oral feedback’ matched trail, oral feedback works. It is simply a staple of good teaching. If we establish a really clear focus for DIRT, with quality models, scaffolds and targets for improvement, then students should be sufficiently focused to allow the teacher to undertake quality ‘one to one feedback’ whilst DIRT is taking place.

We have moved to recording oral feedback sessions, such as using stamps, with students noting their feedback around the stamp, or using an A5 pro forma, to ensure that such feedback is recorded so that students can respond to it fully and to ensure no advice is simply lost because they have forgotten.

5. Exploit the power of peers.

Peer assessment is often derided or done badly, by both students and teachers. For students it can be a poor substitute for teacher feedback. What we can do is use peers as a positive support tool during DIRT time. If my year 8 group are working on spelling and punctuation, then working in pairs is often an effective strategy to lighten their load and help them make minor improvements.

Once more, any peer work needs real focus. If we have peers analysing the work of one another for spelling, punctuation and grammar improvements, then guidelines and expectations need to be explicit. Small details, like getting pairs to sign their feedback can be a small, but powerful way to get students to fully engage in the task. Any pairings of students needs to be carefully considered of course, like any good seating plan.

Useful resources:

The following blog posts helpfully relate to effective DIRTy work:

The inimitable ‘Learning Spy’, David Didau has a really useful DIRT archive: see here.

On ‘making your marking policy a feedback policy‘, with an explanation of how we use DIRT in our English department: see here.

A post outlining a range of strategies for improving written feedback: see here.

A post detailed a range of useful oral feedback strategies: see here.


  1. Pingback: From Twitter this week | Heavers and Selsdon Teaching Resources

  2. Hi Alex I read your blog with interest. DIRTy work is essential in MFL as controlled assessment is worth 60% of total marks! I am constantly looking for various ways to engage my students in the review/reflection process. This year I have used google docs for this purpose and it has worked really well. Students create a folder put all their work in it and share it with me. In this way I can track their progress closely and provide feedback easily using the comment facility. Students seem to like it because the process feels very personal to them and many of them have engaged more fully with their work.

    1. Author

      I can definitely see the capacity if Google Docs. I really must give it a go for English drafting etc. Thanks for the feedback.

    2. Hi Rachel,

      I realise this is a bit of a late answer, but I would love to know if you have any resources you used to start using Google Docs in MFL. I am rather new to Google Docs but it all sounds really interesting and engaging, not mentioning the monitoring of progress and review. Please do let me know! If I can give you anything else in exchange, do ask.
      many thanks in advance,

      Amelie Petiteville

    3. Look at google classroom, its even better with a turn in and reporting recording system…

  3. This is a fantastic blog, and I will be drawing the attention of my non-Twitter colleagues to it 🙂 Meanwhile, would it be possible to have contact details for your Food Technology Dept? I have a colleague who is desperate for literacy input in her subject area. I am wondering if I could get a copy of your colleague’s booklet…. fnantongwe@hotmail.com

  4. Pingback: Stretch and Learn | Marking. Encouraging and evidencing dialog.

  5. Pingback: Does DIRT work in maths? | red or green pen?

  6. Hi Alex,

    Great article! I agree with your comment that most curriculum rarely allocates enough time for DIRT, or any kind of genuine feedback loop.

    I think, particularly in relation to skill development (e.g. literacy, critical analysis, essay writing, historical research), targeted feedback that compels a student to make a concrete change, is vital.

    Often, as teachers, we have far too few opportunities to do this! The feedback structure really needs to be embedded into the teaching and learning, rather than seen as an ‘add-on’ activity.

    I did some research around this last year, and I’ve written a series of articles on it:

    How do you make feedback more valuable?

    Active Learning: The Role of Feedback

    5 Ways to Encourage a Healthy Culture around Success and Failure in your Classroom:

    Grades: A Blindfold to the Learning Process?

    I love your blog!


  7. Pingback: What if you marked every book, every lesson? | Pragmatic Education

  8. Pingback: Marking: Boulder or Butterfly? | Ariadne's Thread

  9. Pingback: The Leeds West Wire » Written Feedback: Further Reading

  10. Pingback: Marking: Experiments and Adventures. | mrbunkeredu

  11. Pingback: Using DIRT as a Learning Journey | UKEdChat.com - Supporting the #UKEdChat Education Community

  12. Pingback: Using pupil feedback to improve teaching | Pedagoo.org

  13. Pingback: Closing the Gap Marking – Twilight CPD | Teaching: Leading Learning

  14. Pingback: My RAG123 marking experiment | mrbenney

  15. Pingback: NCEA TEACHMEET Jan 2014 and the concept of DIRT! « paulcarneyarts BLOG

  16. Pingback: What if you marked every book, every lesson? Reinventing the feedback wheel | Improving Teaching

  17. Pingback: Marking is an act of love – @learningspy – USING DIRT! | parktownprawns

  18. Pingback: Fabulous feedback | misstdunne's blog

  19. Pingback: The FabulousFortnightly Fifteen Minute Forum- numbers 3 & 4 | mrbenney

  20. Pingback: 8. October 2013 #blogsync: Marking with Impact! | EDUTRONIC | #blogsync

  21. Pingback: Marking and Feedback: Before, During & After | Reflective Teacher and Learner

  22. Silly question. I’m a primary teacher. I can write quite well yet I have no clue how to make my feedback “targeted and precise” in literacy lessons. I look at a piece of work and I find myself thinking “Okay, this piece of writing is pretty poor. Um…use a simile next time?” or “Okay, this piece of writing is good. They have punctuated it correctly. Seems fine….Target: – 5 minutes roll by-….oh…uh..write a stronger ending.” I end up wasting my time and make very little impact on the writing. Any help to offer? Please!??

    1. Author

      It is about feeding forward and setting them questions and tasks that address their issues. If they have flaws it could be first proof read….[include two precise things to proof read and improve]. Alternatively, you could identify an issue and get them to practice doing it again by asking them to complete a short writing task that practises the issue. The matter of precision is about zooming in on the issue – such as weak model verbs – then asking them to rewrite three sentences and change the model verbs. It could be that their degree of vocabulary lacks precision. The DIRT task would be for you to circle ten ‘weak’ vocabulary choices and get them to use a thesaurus to select better alternatives.

      The flaw in most feedback is looking back and summing up their issues. We need to look forward – giving them a specific task to practise in DIRT time.

  23. Pingback: Have We Got Feedback Backwards? | HuntingEnglishHuntingEnglish

  24. Pingback: Connect: quick out of the blocks! | Purple Pedagogy

  25. Pingback: Getting DIRTy | barrydunn

  26. Pingback: Mastering Boredom - The Secret to Success - HuntingEnglishHuntingEnglish

  27. Pingback: I shouldn’t feel bad for saying ‘well done’ – #28daysofwriting day 5 – blog. mrstacey. org.uk

  28. Pingback: Keeping the main thing, the main thing – Posts about Feedback from #28daysofwriting | The Curious Creative

  29. Pingback: Sifting through the essentials and the non-essentials | mooneypblog

  30. Pingback: RAGS to Riches Thursday Morning Thriller 26th March 2015 | Purple Pedagogy

  31. Pingback: Whole School Feedback Policy - HuntingEnglishHuntingEnglish

  32. Pingback: How I use DIRT in Drama lessons. | Burt's Drama

  33. Pingback: Reading exercise books | Reading all the Books

  34. Pingback: Feedback: In Search of The Holy Grail | Hannah Tyreman

  35. Pingback: Blog bulletin – Feedback, Feed forward and Marking | joannemilesconsulting

  36. Pingback: Refining assessment without levels | Teaching: Leading Learning

  37. Pingback: Resources on Feedback | eedNET Resource Bank

  38. Pingback: Feedback for progress | Pearltrees

  39. Pingback: EduTech Review: My thoughts on Kaizena feedback tool – amylouisehaywood

  40. Pingback: Resources on Feedback – 8zy3yjlf

  41. Pingback: My Homepage

Leave a Reply to Fran Cancel reply